← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14893/2025disposed

Dharmendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-02Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14893 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-118 Year-2023 Thana- VISHAMBHARPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Dharmendra Yadav Son of Baliram Yadav Resident of Village- Nawada Gamhariya PS- Jadopur, Dist- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Adesh Raj Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-04-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of three cases and the allegation is of recovery of 40.2 litres of liquor from three gunny bag and 01 litres of liquor from possession of Subhash Kumar.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he had no concern with the alleged three gunny bag nor petitioner has any concern or relation with Subhash Kumar and he came to be implicated at

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14893 of 2025(2) dt.02-04-2025 2/3 the instance of local person, but then, the name of the person, who disclosed the name of the petitioner is not disclosed in the F.I.R., which cast an aspersion on the case of the prosecution. It is next submitted that police in a mechanically manner investigates and implicates either at the instance of secret informant and confessional statement in a mechanical manner without holding proper investigation.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on provisional anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-IV-cum-Exclusive Special Judge Excise Court-II, Gopalganj in connection with Bishambharpur P. S. Case No.118 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

8. It is made clear that the learned trial Court after

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14893 of 2025(2) dt.02-04-2025 3/3 accepting the provisional bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than three cases, in that event, the present provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but if on verification, it is found that petitioner has antecedent of only three cases, in that event, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T