Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20614/2018bail granted

Navin Kumar @ Navin Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2018-05-14Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20614 of 2018 (2) dt.14-05-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20614 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -46 Year- 2017 Thana -NATIONAL HIGHWAY BANGRA DistrictSAMASTIPUR ====================================================== NAVIN KUMAR @ NAVIN KUMAR SINGH Son of Ashok Kumar Singh, Resident of Village-Fatehpur Ward No. 6 P.S.-Musrigharari, DistrictSamastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pravin Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 14-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner, who is in custody since 22.05.2017 has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with National Highway Bangra P.S. Case No. 46 of 2017 for the offences alleged under Sections 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act having earlier been rejected by this Court by order dated 09.11.2017 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 51353 of 2017.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with recovery of a pistol and two live cartridges from his possession. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the period of custody already suffered since 22.05.2017 let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20614 of 2018 (2) dt.14-05-2018 (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Samastipur in connection with National Highway Bangra P.S. Case No. 46 of 2017 on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. Chandran/BT (Vikash Jain, J) U T