Digvijay Yadav @ Dig Vijay Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.18531 of 2015 Arising Out of P.S.Case No. -17 Year- 2015 Thana -DURGAWATI District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================
1. Munna Yadav @ Munana Yadav son of Late Ram Jatan Yadav
2. Paramanand Yadav @ Parmanand Singh Yadav son of Faiku Yadav
3. Ram Pravesh Singh @ Rampravesh Yadav son of Ramashankar Yadav
4. Lalman Yadav @ Lavaman Yadav @ Lalman singh son of Faiku Yadav All resident of village Kavilashpur, P.S.- Durgawati, District- Kaimur at Bhabua.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.22100 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -17 Year- 2015 Thana -DURGAWATI District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ======================================================
1. Digvijay Yadav @ Dig Vijay Yadav son of Narsingh Yadav
2. Narasingh Yadav son of Bhola Yadav
3. Ran Vijay Singh Yadav @ Ran Vijay Yadav son of Narsingh Yadav
4. Surendra Yadav son of Late Shyam Narayan Yadav
5. Rampyare Yadav @ Ram Pyare Singh Yadav son of Sahowan Yadav
6. Ramjee Yadav @ Ramjee Singh Yadav son of Basawan Yadav All resident of village Kavilashpur, P.S.- Durgawati, District- Kaimur at Bhabua.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In Cr.Misc. No.18531 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Kant Pandey, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Harendra Prasad (APP) (In Cr.Misc. No.22100 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Kant Pandey, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 01-09-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Having regard to the nature of injury allegedly caused
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18531 of 2015 (3) dt.01-09-2015 2/2 by the petitioners and others and thus, making them liable for offence under Section 307 and other allied offence of the Indian Penal Code, this Court will not be inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail specially when it finds that two persons, on account of indiscriminate assault by the petitioners and others, had sustained grievous injuries and one of them had head injury (parietal region).
That being so, the prayer for anticipatory bail of all the petitioners is hereby rejected and they are all directed to surrender and if they do so, their prayer for regular bail shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced anything said in this order.
(Mihir Kumar Jha, J) Sujit/- U