Chandramauli Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15061 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2025 Thana- PANDARAK District- Patna ====================================================== 1.
Chandramauli Yadav Son of Late Chhotan Yadav 2.
Satish Kumar Son of Chandramauli Yadav Both are resident of Village - Kondi, P.S. - Pandarak, Dist. - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ashok Kumar Kashyap, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-03-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.
2. Petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Pandarak P.S.Case No.190 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(3), 190, 61(2)(a), 109(1), 125, 126(2), 115(2), 303(2) of BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the allegation made in the FIR with a common intention altogether 19 accused persons named in the FIR along with the petitioners fired upon the informant while he was requesting to maintain peace in the cultural programme.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that petitioner no.1 is the order giver and general and omnibus allegation has been levelled against the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15061 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026 2/3 petitioner no.2. Specific allegation of firing is against coaccused Amarjeet @ China Ray, Kundan Ray and Rishi Ray, who fired by Moujar, which hit to two persons, causing they sustained fire arm injuries. Petitioners have clean antecedent and they seek to be released on pre-arrest bail.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners.
6. Having heard the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the the FIR, I find that general and omnibus allegation has been alleged against the petitioners. The injuries have been found to be simple in nature. I find that the petitioners have made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.
7. The learned District Court is directed to release the petitioners on pre-arrest bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned district court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM Ist, Barh, Patna/concerned court, in connection with Pandarak PS Case No.190 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of BNSS of 2023.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15061 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026 3/3
8. The learned district court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and if it is found that the petitioners are involved in some other cases as what has been stated in paragraph No.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force.
(Purnendu Singh, J) chn/- U T