Pappu Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19165 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-260 Year-2023 Thana- BELDOUR District- Khagaria ====================================================== Pappu Kumar Yadav Son Of Sikendar Yadav Resident Of Village - Kanjari, P.S. - Beldaur, District - Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Saroj Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s :
Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 27-06-2024 1.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 504, 506, 279, 427 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3.
The learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of two cases and has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from bare perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would that the same does not inspire confidence. It is further submitted that the informant alleges that petitioner, being his friend, had taken a friendly loan of Rs. 4 lakh for two months which was transferred in his account, but despite
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19165 of 2024(3) dt.27-06-2024 2/3 informant requesting the petitioner to return the money, the same was not being returned and petitioner even threatened, further on 22-9-2023 at about 4:00 pm in the evening while the informant was going to drop his friend by his Breeza car, when the same met with an accident with a Creta car and when he confronted the driver of the vehicle, firing was resorted to, but the informant was saved.
4.
The learned counsel submits that petitioner has been implicated in the instant criminal case on account of dispute relating to money, which the petitioner does not owe. It is also submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it does not even remotely suggest that Creta car was being driven by the petitioner.
5.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19165 of 2024(3) dt.27-06-2024 3/3 is pending/successor court in connection with Beldaur P.S. Case No. 260 of 2023 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T