Rahul Yadav @ Rahul Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23934 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -24 Year- 2013 Thana -MEHUS District- SEKHPURA ====================================================== Rahul Yadav @ Rahul Ray Son of Shri Sadhu Sharan Yadav Resident of Village- Audhey, Police Station- Sheikhpura, District- Sheikhpura. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bipin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Indu Bala Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Mehus P.S.Case No. 24 of 2013 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner is not named in the FIR and he is writer of the fardbeyan of this case but later on he has been made accused. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is absolutely nothing against the petitioner and he is not named in the FIR and later on he has been made accused in this case and he is in custody since 13.4.2017.

Heard learned APP also, who has opposed the prayer for bail stating that his name has been transpired in paragraph-18 of the case diary but in that paragraph there is no specific allegation against him.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23934 of 2017 (3) dt.11-07-2017 2/2 facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Jigar Sah, Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Sheikhpura, in connection with Mehus P.S.Case No. 24 of 2013, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U