Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48730/2017bail granted

Chandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-10-12Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48730 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48730 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -217 Year- 2017 Thana -FATUHA District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Chandan Kumar Son of Late Birendra Prasad, R/o VillageGulamchiyabagh, Pakkidargarh, P.S.- Didarganj, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Jagdhar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-10-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No. 217 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 1530 litres of foreign made liquor.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 08.06.2017 and other co-accused of this case has already been enlarged on bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 21.09.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 46789 of 2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48730 of 2017 (2) dt.12-10-2017 Having heard both sides, admittedly in this case huge quantity of liquor has been recovered, however, since other accused person has already been enlarged on bail, let this petitioner also be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Patna, in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No. 217 of 2017. (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T