Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24044/2018bail granted

Chaitu Sadai v. The State Of Bihar

2018-05-15Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24044 of 2018 (2) dt.15-05-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.24044 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -28 Year- 2017 Thana -PHULPARAS District- MADHUBANI ====================================================== Chaitu Sadai, Son of Lodai Sadai, Resident of Village- Paita, P.S.- Phulparas, District- Madhubani.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajkishore Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 15-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner, who is in custody since 21.03.2017 has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 28 of 2017 for the offences alleged under Sections 21 and 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act having earlier been rejected by this Court by order dated 22.09.2017 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 37133 of 2017.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and in any event in a subsequent development, charges have now been framed on 17.12.2017.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the period of custody already suffered since 21.03.2017, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Madhubani in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 28 of 2017 on the following conditions:-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24044 of 2018 (2) dt.15-05-2018 (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T