Siddhi Sadan Giri v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6359 of 2015 ====================================================== Siddhi Sadan Giri, S/o Late Jagannath Giri, resident of Village Madud, P.S. Khudaganj, District Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar.
2.
The District Magistrate, Nalanda.
3.
The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Hilsa, District Nalanda. 4.
The Circle Officer, Islampur, District Nalanda. 5.
The Officer-in-charge, Khodganj, Police Station - Khodganj, District Nalanda.
... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Ravi Kant Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents :
Mr. Sita Ram Yadav, G.P.-16 Mr. Jitendra Kumar, A.C. to G.P.-16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-12-2022 Heard the parties.
In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondents to depute a Magistrate and a police force for fencing of the petitioner's land.
A counter affidavit has been filed by the State. Paragraph no.7 of the said counter affidavit reads as under:- "7. That the statement made in paragraph no.9 of the writ petition is incorrect hence, denied. In this regard, it is submitted that the Respondent authorities have taken all possible steps and made several correspondences with regard to deputation of Magistrate. The Circle Officer, Islampur vide his
Patna High Court CWJC No.6359 of 2015(2) dt.06-12-2022 2/2 letter no.667 dated 24.07.2014 and letter no. 725 dated 13.08.2014 informed D.C.L.R., Hilsa regarding completion of demarcation proceeding and further requested of deputation of Magistrate for fencing at petitioner's land but no order could be passed as the same is under consideration." In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction that if the matter is still pending then appropriate order for deputing a Magistrate for fencing the land of the petitioner shall be passed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. It the matter has already been resolved then there is no need for appointing any Magistrate.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U