Parmeshwar Giri v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5670 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -267 Year- 2016 Thana -GOVINDGANJ DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Parmeshwar Giri S/o Late Daroga Giri, R/o Village- Govindganj, P.S.- Govindganj, District- East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shakti Suman Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ajay Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 02-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner has been in custody since 14.12.2017 in connection with Govindganj P.S. Case No. 267 of 2016 for the offence registered under Sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 448, 379, 380 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is case and counter case between the parties with injuries on both sides. It is further submitted that the present case has been filed by the informant only to put pressure upon the petitioner for entering into compromise with the informant in connection with Govindganj P.S. Case No. 268 of 2016. It is further submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in connection with the present case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and that the petitioner has also sustained injuries, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., 1st, Motihari East Champaran in connection with Govindganj P.S. Case No. 267 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:-

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and

in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Anjana Mishra, J) Jagdish/- U T