← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./13687/2019bail rejected

Babuni Dom And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2019-06-19Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13687 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-138 Year-2018 Thana- AGIAON District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.

BABUNI DOM Son of Late Murari Dom Resident of Village- Karath, P.S.- Tarari, District- Bhojpur 2.

Telhu Dom Son of Late Murari Dom Resident of Village- Karath, P.S.- Tarari, Dist- Bohjpur.

3.

Sanjay Dom @ Sajan Dom Son of Late Banarsi Dom Resident of VillageKauri, P.S.- Sandesh, District- Bhojpur. 4.

Sunil Dom Son of Pipal Dom Resident of Village- Jahanabad Khanbahadur Road, P.S.- Jahanabad Town, District- Jahanabad. 5.

Halchal Dom Son of Late Lalan Dom Resident of Agion, P.S.- Grahani, District- Bhojpur, 6.

Sunny Kumar Son of Halchal Dom Resident of Agion, P.S.- Grahani, District- Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Anurag Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Agion (G) P.S. Case No.138 of 2018 registered under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-V, Bhojpur at Ara. The accusation is of causing assault to Lalan Ram, the father of the informant Ajay Kumar, by the petitioners and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13687 of 2019(3) dt.19-06-2019 2/2 others, who died in course of treatment.

Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioners, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. However, the petitioners are directed to surrender before the trial court within eight weeks from today and pray for regular bail, which shall be considered by the trial court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T