Mukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25682 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2020 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
MUKESH KUMAR SON OF RAM BALAK KUMAR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MAYAPUR, P.S.- BUNIYADGANJ, DISTRICT-GAYA 2.
NIRANJAN KUMAR SON OF RAJENDRA YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MAYAPUR, P.S.- BUNIYADGANJ, DISTRICT-GAYA 3.
RAJESH YADAV SON OF RAM CHANDA YADAV @ RAM CHANDRA YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MAYAPUR, P.S.- BUNIYADGANJ, DISTRICT-GAYA 4.
CHHOTU YADAV SON OF LATE DAHU YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MAYAPUR, P.S.- BUNIYADGANJ, DISTRICT-GAYA 5.
RAJ BALLAM YADAV SON OF MAHESH YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MAYAPUR, P.S.- BUNIYADGANJ, DISTRICT-GAYA 6.
LALAN YADAV SON OF BADAN YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGEMAYAPUR, P.S.- BUNIYADGANJ, DISTRICT-GAYA ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ravindra Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Akbar Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 18-02-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the application of petitioner no.3, namely, Rajesh Yadav, who has died.
Permission is accorded.
The application of petitioner no.3, namely, Rajesh Yadav is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. Heard both sides.
Petitioner nos.1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 apprehend their arrest in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25682 of 2021(2) dt.18-02-2022 2/2 Mufassil P.S. Case No.100 of 2020 registered under Section 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have committed no offence and have falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that from perusal of the F.I.R., it would be evident that there is no specific allegation against the petitioners. Petitioners were only members of the mob. The petitioners have got no criminal antecedent.
Having considered the above facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bonds to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya or his successor in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No.100 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Harish/- (Arvind Srivastava, J) U T