Sharda Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15280 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-131 Year-2025 Thana- KOCHAS District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.
Sharda Devi W/O Shiv Mohar Ram Resident of village - Tetaria, P.S. Kochas, Dist.- Rohtas 2.
Sanjay Ram Son of Late Lal Mohar Ram Resident of village - Tetaria, P.S. Kochas, Dist Rohtas 3.
Chunmun Kumar Son of Shiv Mohar Ram Resident of village - Tetaria, P.S. Kochas, Dist Rohtas 4.
Ajit Ram Son of Shiv Mohar Ram Resident of village - Tetaria, P.S. Kochas, Dist Rohtas 5.
Sonia Devi @ Soni Devi Wife of Srikant Ram Resident of village - Tetaria, P.S. Kochas, District Rohtas 6.
Mithlesh Ram @ Mithlesh Kumar Son of Srikant Ram Resident of village - Tetaria, P.S. Kochas, District Rohtas 7.
Shiv Mohar Ram Son of Nathuna Ram @ Nathuni Ram Resident of village - Tetaria, P.S. Kochas, Dist.- Rohtas 8.
Srikant Ram Son of Nathuna Ram @ Nathuni Ram Resident of village - Tetaria, P.S. Kochas, Dist.- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kamla Kant Pandey, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Binod Kumar, APP For the Informant :
Mr. Rameshwar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 12-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352 and 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. As per prosecution case, all the accused persons
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15280 of 2026(3) dt.12-05-2026 2/3 including the petitioners abused and assaulted the informant and his family members due to which they sustained injuries.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. Further submission is that petitioners and informant are co-villagers and due to petty dispute, some altercation took place between them. There is case and counter case between the parties. The F.I.R. has been lodged after a delay of two days without any plausible reason. The nature of the injury to the injured is simple. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. They undertake to cooperate in the investigation and trial.
5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel for the informant opposed the bail application.
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the case and counter case between the parties and fair antecedent of petitioners, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15280 of 2026(3) dt.12-05-2026 3/3 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Judge-VIII-cum-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Kochas P.S. Case No. 131 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Utkarsh/- Koustav/- U T