← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/675/2015disposed

Sri Baidya Nath Sanskrit Prathmik Sah Madhya Vidyalaya, Bhelahi East Champaran v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-07-14Mr. Justice Mihir Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.675 of 2015 In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 6342 of 2013 ====================================================== Sri Baidya Nath Sanskrit Prathmik Sah Madhya Vidyalaya, Bhelahi East Champaran, through its Head Master Uma Shankar Pandey, S/o Sri Awadh Pandey, Resident of Village & P.O.-Purandra, P.S.-Palanwa, District-East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna namely Sri R.K.Mahajan.

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna namely Sri R.K.Mahajan..

3. The Deputy Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna namely Sri Ashutosh.

4. The Special Director, Sanskrit Primary and Adult Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna namely Sri Suresh Choudhary.

5. The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna through its Secretary namely Sri Thakur Manoranjan Prasad.

6. The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna, namely Prof. Ramdev Prasad.

7. The Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna namely Sri Thakur Manoranjan Prasad.

.... .... O.P/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajeev Lochan, Advocate.

For the O.P/s :

Mr. J.S. Barnwal- GA-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 14-07-2015 Having regard to the fact that the order of this Court dated 17.04.2013 in C.W.J.C. No. 8346 of 2012 has been complied by way of not only restoring the recognition of the

Patna High Court MJC No.675 of 2015 (5) dt.14-07-2015 2/2 school of the petitioner but a decision also has been taken for making payment of salary to the teaching and non-teaching employee, this Court does not find any reason now to continue with this contempt proceeding.

It is, accordingly, dropped.

(Mihir Kumar Jha, J) Sujit/- U