← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3365/2026disposed

Anita Jaiswal v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-16Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3365 of 2026 ====================================================== Anita Jaiswal Wife of Sri Sanjay Jaiswal, resident of S.B.I. Officers Colony, Ambedkar Path, Police Station-Rukunpura, District-Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Urban Development Department. 2.

The Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

3.

The Arbitrator cum Divisional Commissioner, Patna. 4.

The Collector cum District Magistrate, Patna. 5.

The Project Director, National Highway Authority of India, Project Implementation Unit, Patna 11 Flat No. G-1 and G-2, Block-B Clasioen Shiv Mitra, Vivekanand Marg, North S.K. Puri, Patna. 6.

The Competent Authority cum District Land Acquisition Officer, Patna Collectoriate, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Standing Counsel (25) For NHAI :

Mr. Sanat Kumar Mishra, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 16-03-2026 Heard Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State as also 'the NHAI'.

2. The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s):

(i) for issuance of an appropriate Writ, order or direction to the respondents for setting aside the orders dated 25/1/2023 & 13/1/2025 passed by the Respondent No. 6 & the Arbitrator cum Divisional Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna in Arbitration Case No. 74/2023 as contained

Patna High Court CWJC No.3365 of 2026(2) dt.16-03-2026 2/2 in Annexure- P/5 and P/6 of the Petition whereby and where under he was pleased to reject the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 3 (G)(5) of the National Highway Act of 1956 with respect to Award No. 41 concerning Khata No. 58, C.S Khata No. 775, Area 23 Decimal under Thana No.

94, Mauza- Khaspur, Anchal Maner DistrictPatna and further been pleased to hold the compensation amount given by the competent Authority cum District Land Acquisition Officer, Patna as valid and in accordance with law and with this observation he was pleased to close the matter.

(ii) For giving any other relief or reliefs as may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be approaching the Competent Authority/Court for the redressal of the grievance.

4. Granting said liberty, the writ petition is disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U