← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/407/2022disposed

Raj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-07-27Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.407 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.139 of 2021 ====================================================== 1.

Raj Kumar Son of Ram Lachhan Paswan, Resident of Village Madarpur, P.S.-Punpun, District-Patna.

2.

Neeraj Pandey Son of Mithilesh Pandey Resident of Village-Pipardahan, P.S.-Paliganj, District-Patna.

3.

Gautam Kumar Son of Bal Sundar Paswan Resident of Vilalge-Terati, P.S.- Dhanarua, District-Patna.

4.

Raju Kumar Son of Shyam Babu Paswan Resident of VillageMahammadpur, P.S.-Bakhtiyarpur, District-Patna. 5.

Premchandra Kumar Son of Mahendra Paswan Resident of VillageDariyarpur, Mainpura, P.S.-Phulwarisharif, District-Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Awanish Kumar Awasthi Chief Secretary, Home (Police Department),Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

Dr. Chandrasekhar Singh, The District Magistrate, Patna. 3.

Mr. Manavjeet Singh Dhilo, the Senior Superintendnent of Police Patna. 4.

Mrs. Indra Rani Kumari, the Circle Officer, Punpun in the District of Patna. 5.

Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh the Circle Officer Paliganj, in the District of Patna.

6.

Mr. Rishi Kumar, The Circle Officer, Dhanarua in the District of Patna. 7.

Mr. Raghubeer Prasad, the Circle Officer, Bakhtiyarpur in the District of Patna.

8.

Mr. Chandan Kumar, the Circle Officer Phulwarisharif in the District of Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay (GA 5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL ORDER 27-07-2022 Respondents have filed show along with the document.

Perusal of Annexure-A it is evident that petitioners'

Patna High Court MJC No.407 of 2022(4) dt.27-07-2022 2/2 grievance has been redressed not only reinstating but also giving posting in different places. If the petitioners are not in receipt of order dated 22.07.2022 (Annexure-A) they are permitted to report at places of posting within a period of two weeks from today subject to outcome of LPA No. 148 of 2022. Accordingly, contempt proceeding stands dropped. (P. B. Bajanthri, J) Vikash/- U