Md. Arshad Ali @ Gadar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13820 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-577 Year-2018 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada ====================================================== MD. ARSHAD ALI @ GADAR, Aged about 21 years, Male, Son of Md. Akhtar Ali, Resident of Village - Ansar Nagar, Near Maszid, P.S.- and P.O.- Nawada, Distt.- Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Anita Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 14-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 380 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is recovery of one stolen mobile from his possession.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing was recovered from his possession. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 30.12.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13820 of 2019(2) dt.14-03-2019 2/2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Nawada (Bundelkhand) P.S. Case No. 577 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T