Jang Lal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37823 of 2017 (3) dt.13-12-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37823 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -78 Year- 2012 Thana -PALANWA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Jang Lal Yadav, Son of Kamal Yadav, Resident of Village- Gangapur, P.S.- Palanwa, District- East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shakil Ahmad Khan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ajay Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 13-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No. 75 of 2012 arising out of Palanwa P.S. Case No. 78 of 2012 registered under Sections 20(B), 22, 23 and 24 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected on 04.05.2016 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 15322 of 2016 with direction to the court below to take effective steps to conclude the trial of the petitioner within six months and if the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within six months, he may renew his prayer for bail.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37823 of 2017 (3) dt.13-12-2017 While more six months has been passed but the trial of the petitioner has not been concluded.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 7th Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No. 75 of 2012 arising out of Palanwa P.S. Case No. 78 of 2012. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T