Rabindra Prasad Yadav v. The Managing Director, Bihar State Food And Civil Supply Corporation And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6122 of 2016 ====================================================== Rabindra Prasad Yadav, Son of Sri Krit Narayan Yadav, resident of village- Arar, P.S.- Gowalpara, District- Madhepura and Chairman of Reshana Primary Agriculture Shakh Cooperative Society, Gowalpara, Madhepura .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Managing Director, Bihar State Food & Civil Supply Corporation, Sone Bhawan, Bir Chand Patel Path, Patna.

2. The Deputy Chief (Claim), Bihar State Food & Civil Supply Corporation, Patna.

3. The District Manager, Bihar State Food & Civil Supply Corporation, Madhepura.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Md. Raisul Haque, SC-4 For the Respondent-BSFC : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 28-06-2016 Heard Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'the Corporation') and its authorities. The petitioner is the Chairman of Reshana Primary Agriculture Credit Cooperative Society, Gowalpara in the district of Madhepura and raises a grievance against the action of the respondent-Corporation in not making payment of the dues towards the supply of 'CMR'

amounting to Rs.89,17,744.55.

Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in reference to Annexure-2 which is

Patna High Court CWJC No.6122 of 2016 (2) dt.28-06-2016 a letter of recommendation of the District Manager submits that there is no dispute as to the supply of 'CMR' yet steps are not being taken by 'the Corporation' for payment of the price although representations have been filed by the petitioner before the Managing Director of 'the Corporation' copies of which are present at Annexure-3 series.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the limited grievance raised in the writ petition I deem it fit and proper to direct the Managing Director of 'the Corporation' to either consider the grievance of the petitioner by himself or appropriately direct any officer empowered for the purpose to consider the claim of the petitioner and dispose of the same within a period three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

Needless to add that the admissible claim of the petitioner be paid to him within the period stipulated above and any claim not found to be admissible be disposed of by a speaking order after hearing the petitioner but within the period stipulated above.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. (Jyoti Saran, J) SKPathak/- U