Akhilesh Kumar Mandal @ Akhilesh Kumar@Akhilesh Mandal And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32296 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -27 Year- 2016 Thana -ALAMNAGAR District- MADHEPURA ======================================================

1. Akhilesh Kumar Mandal @ Akhilesh Kumar@Akhilesh Mandal, Son of Late Suresh Mandal, Resident of Village Kolwara, P.S. Alamnagar, Dist. Madhepura.

2. Sudin Mandal, Son of Bino Mandal, Resident of Village Kolwara, P.S. Alamnagar, Dist. Madhepura.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 09-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioners are seeking bail in connection with Alamnagar P.S. Case No. 27 of 2016 registered for offences under sections 25(1-b)a/26/35 of the Arms Act. Earlier the petitioners had moved before this Court with a prayer for bail in Cr. Misc. No. 39256 of 2016 and this Court vide order dated 19.9.2016 rejected the same with a direction to the court below to conclude the trial within a period of nine months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, namely, Akhilesh Kumar Mandal @ Akhilesh Kumar @ Akhilesh Mandal and Sudin Mandal, be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32296 of 2017 (2) dt.09-08-2017 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Udakishunganj, Madhepura in connection with Alamnagar (Ratwara) P.S. Case No. 27 of 2016, subject to the condition that (i) one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners (ii) if the petitioners are found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of their bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and (iii) the petitioners would cooperate the proceeding of the court below. In event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass the order, including cancellation of bail bonds. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- U T