Awadhesh Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14147 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-385 Year-2024 Thana- PANAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Awadhesh Sahani S/O Ram Nath Sahani R/O Vill.- Rashauli, Malah Toli, P.S.- Panapur, Dist.- Saran 2.

Putul Sahni S/O Ram Nath Sahni R/O Vill.- Rashauli, Malah Toli, P.S.- Panapur, Dist.- Saran 3.

Mukesh Sahni S/O Ram Nath Sahni R/O Vill.- Rashauli, Malah Toli, P.S.- Panapur, Dist.- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhananjay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 19-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

2. The prayer has been made by the petitioners for grant of regular bail in connection with Panapur P.S.Case No.385 of 2024 registered under sections 126(2), 115, 118(1), 109, 352 ,351(2), 3(5) of the BNS.

3. It appears from the perusal of the first information report that there is specific allegation on petitioner no. 1 of having assaulted the informant with Farsa on the head causing grievous injury. So far as petitioner no. 2 is concerned, he has only been named as an accused and no overt act has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14147 of 2025(2) dt.19-03-2025 2/3 attributed against him.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in the case of petitioner no. 3 namely, Mukesh Sahni, there is allegation on him of giving lathi blow to the son of the informant Vickey Sahni. However, the injury report as annexed to the petition would show that the same has been caused by hard and blunt object and it is simple in nature in the nature of laceration.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and after hearing the counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State and also considering the period of custody since 24.12.2024, the petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-IX, Saran at Chapra in connection with Panapur P.S.Case No. 385 of 2024.

6. With regard to petitioner no. 1 namely, Awadhesh Sahani, I do not feel inclined to grant bail to petitioner no. 1 for the present. However, liberty is granted to him to renew his prayer for bail after completion of six months in custody. (Soni Shrivastava, J) N.K/- U T

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14147 of 2025(2) dt.19-03-2025 3/3