Vikash Kumar @ Laddan @ Chote Sarkar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15535 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-203 Year-2021 Thana- CHANDAUTI District- Gaya ====================================================== Vikash Kumar @ Laddan @ Chote Sarkar S/o- Late Manoj Paswan R/o Mohalla- Katari PS-Chandauti Distt- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Pintu Kumar Patel, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-03-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Chandauti P.S. Case No.203 of 2021, F.I.R dated 30.07.2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 308, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. According to prosecution case, on 29.07.2021 at about 9:30 PM, while the informant was going to drop Nagendra Kumar near Katari Manutoli, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons allegedly intercepted him, abused and assaulted him with an iron rod causing head injury and rendering him unconscious, and also snatched his gold chain and Rs.18,000/-.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15535 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026 2/3 specific allegation of overt act has been attributed rather the allegations levelled against the petitioner are general and omnibus and the co-accused person have already been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by the learned Trial Court and the injuries sustained by the informant are simple in nature. It has further been submitted that the petitioner has clean antecedent.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances that there is no specific allegation of overt act rather the allegations against this petitioner are general and omnibus and the co-accused person have already been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by the learned Trial Court and the injuries sustained by the informant are simple in nature. Accordingly, this Court is inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his/her arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15535 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026 3/3 satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Gaya, in connection with Chandauti P.S. Case No.203 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and with other following conditions:- (i) one of the bailors should be the family member/relative/known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document/personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide; (ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/her/their bail bond by the Trial Court itself; (iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;
(iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. (Ajit Kumar, J) sharun/- U T