Kamakhya Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 19294 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -44 Year- 1987 Thana -KUTUMBA District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Kamakhya Singh Son of Indrajit Singh Resident of Village - Lauabar, P.S. Tandwa, District - Aurangabad.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Pd. Nat(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2.

17-06-2015 Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rajendra Pd. Nat, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.

The petitioner, who was made accused long back in the year 1987 in Kutumba P.S. Case No. 44 of 1987 registered for the offence under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after investigation, the case was not found true against the petitioner and as such, final report was submitted, however; learned Magistrate, differing with the police report, had taken cognizance of offence. Accordingly, he makes a prayer for extending the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19294 of 2015 (2) dt.17-06-2015 2/2 On perusal of the record, it is evident that order of cognizance was passed in the year 1993 itself and the present anticipatory bail petition has been filed in the year 2015. In view of the fact that order of cognizance was passed long back in the year 1993, I do not find any ground to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U T