Md. Avad Alam @ Md Ibad Alam @ Md. Ibad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17029 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-337 Year-2025 Thana- DAGARUA District- Purnia ====================================================== Md. Avad Alam @ Md Ibad Alam @ Md. Ibad S/O Md. Sarfaraj Alam @ Sarfaraj Alam R/O Village - Chandbhati, P.S- Dagarua, District- Purnia ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
XX W/O Y R/O Village - Udharna Ward no- 03, P.S- Dargarua, DistrictPurnia ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vivekanand Singh, Advocate Mr. Hira Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP Mr. Mithilesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Md Fazle Karim, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 06-05-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Dagarua P.S. Case no.337 of 2025, registered under sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that his 13 year old daughter was taken away by the seven named accused persons including the petitioner herein and she was not to be found inspite of search.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. There is an
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17029 of 2026(3) dt.06-05-2026 2/2 unexplained delay of two days in lodging of the FIR. In the medical report her age has been estimated to be 15-17 years and the same does not support the prosecution case. The petitioner is in custody since 8.9.2025 and has no criminal antecedent.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the FIR together with the statement of the 13 year old victim recorded under section 183 of the BNSS wherein she names the petitioner and states that the petitioner forced himself upon her, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.
7. Learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/- U T