Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14724 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2024 Thana- BALIYA District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.
Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Rai Son of Subhash Ray Resident of VillageNauranga Diyara, P.S.- Bairia, District- Begusarai 2.
Abhinandan Kumar @ Golu Yadav @ Golu Kumar Son of Subhash Ray Resident of Village- Nauranga Diyara, P.S.- Bairia, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bipin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Harendra Prasad, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 387, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per prosecution case, on the incident day, petitioner no. 1 armed with pistol, demanded rangdari from the informant and thereafter, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, assaulted informant and snatched jewellery and other articles.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Both
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14724 of 2026(2) dt.28-04-2026 2/2 parties are co-villagers and due to petty dispute, altercation took place between them in which both sides sustained injuries. Injuries sustained by the injured are simple in nature. It is further submitted that though there is allegation of firing but no one sustained any firearms injury. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus. Rest of the allegations are ornamental only to make the case grave.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the nature of accusation and injuries, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Ballia P. S. Case No. 102 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T