Patna High CourtL.P.A/740/2016dismissed

M/S Purnea Plywood Industries v. The Bihar State Financial Corporation And ORS

2017-11-15Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.740 of 2016 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2071 of 2013 =========================================================== M/s Purnea Plywood Industries through its Managing Partner, Ramesh Chand Agrawal, son of late Ram Narayan Chand, R/o Mohalla Bhatta, Khajanchi hat, P.S. Sadar, District Patna .... .... Petitioner - Appellant

Versus

1. The Bihar State Financial Corporation through its Chair Person / Managing Director, Patna,

2. The Manager, I/c Zone I, The Bihar State Financial Corporation, Patna,

3. The Branch Manager, The Bihar State Financial Corporation, Purnea Branch, Purnia.

.... .... Respondents - Respondents.

=========================================================== Appearance:

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Kamal Nayan Chaubey, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Ambuj Nayan Chaubey, Ms. Ritu Priyadarshi, Mr. Dineshwar Pandey, Mr. Animesh Kumar and Mr. Prashant, Advocates.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raju Giri, Advocate. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 15-11-2017 Heard learned Senior Counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent.

The default and blame lies at the doorstep of the appellant. The indulgence shown to him by the High Court way back in the year 1996 in the previous round of litigation has not been availed of by the appellant. If the High Court reached out to the appellant and gave him

Patna High Court LPA No.740 of 2016 dt.15-11-2017 2/2 a lease of life way back in the year 1996 he cannot come rushing back to the High Court second time over in the year 2013 asking for mercy or indulgence with regard to payment of the amount fixed in the year 1996 without any kind of additional liability or any action initiated for the said default.

The High Court has rightly dismissed the Writ Application vide the order dated 22.02.2016 and the same does not require any interference.

Appeal is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Dilip, AR AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 15.11.2017 Transmission Date N/A