Patna High CourtCWJC/5354/2012disposed

Smt. Pushpa Gupta v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-07-04Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5354 of 2012 =========================================================== Smt. Pushpa Gupta Widow Of Late Dr. Bidya Nand Gupta Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Simri Bakhtiyarpur, District Saharsa, Residing At Birpur Ward No. 1, P.S. + P.O. Birpur, District-Supaul .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

3. The Deputy Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

4. The Director-In-Chief, Health Services, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

5. The Chief Medical Officer-Cum-Civil Surgeon, Saharsa

6. The Incharge Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Simri Bakhtiyarpur, Saharsa

7. The District Provident Fund Officer, Saharsa .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : Mr. Sanjay Sinha, A.C. to G.A. 4. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 04-07-2016 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State is present.

The petitioner has moved the Court seeking payment of the following retiral dues :

(i) Pension (ii) Gratuity (iii) Amount concerning un-utilised earned leave. (iv) The difference of pay on account of A.C.P.

(v) Amount concerning difference of pay scale, and

Patna High Court CWJC No.5354 of 2012 dt.04-07-2016 (vi) Arrears of salary till the death of her husband. From the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent No. 6 it transpires that the admitted dues under various heads have been paid. Copy of counter affidavit, though affirmed on 13.05.2013, has not been served on the learned counsel for the petitioner on the ground that he could not be contacted. Today also since he is not present, the same has not been served. Taking into account the fact that as per stand of the respondents on affidavit that all admitted dues have been paid as also the fact that nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner, the Court can only presume that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Amin/- U