← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12012/2018bail granted

Santosh Manjhi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2018-02-27Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12012 of 2018 (2) dt.27-02-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12012 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -44 Year- 2016 Thana -BELCHHI District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Santosh Manjhi, aged about 34 years, son of Ramprit Manjhi.

2. Love Kumar @ Lav Kumar @ Lab Kumar @ Labh Kumar, aged about 27 years, son of Ghuleten Paswan @ Ghuleten Mandal, both resident of village- Belchhi, P.S.- Belchhi, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anish Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 27-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Belchhi P.S. Case No.44 of 2016, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 504, 353 and 427/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation has been made that on 25.09.2016 the police got information that 30-40 persons entered into the campus of the police station and destroyed some records. They were anger dues to an incident which happened one day before in which a co-accused Priya Ranjan @ Monu was caught by the police in vehicle checking. It is also alleged that police resorted to lathi charge for controlling the situation and also made a video-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12012 of 2018 (2) dt.27-02-2018 graph of this incident and on the basis of footage of that video these petitioner along with other co-accused were found involved in the occurrence.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits save and except omnibus allegation nothing specific has been mentioned against the petitioners. He further submits that other co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court. Looking to the nature of allegation, let the abovenamed petitioners, be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M. Barh, in connection with Belchhi P.S. Case No.44 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U T