Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15068/2016rejected

Ajeet Thakur And ORS. v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2016-07-11Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15068 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -3557 Year- 2015 Thana -VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Ajeet Thakur Son of Late Kailash Thakur

2. Sharwan Ray, Son of Binda Ray

3. Bindeshwar Ray @ Bindeshwari Ray Son of Late Nandan Ray

4. Sarvesh Ray, Son of Binda Ray

5. Amarjeet Ray Son of Bindeshwari Ray

6. Binda Ray, Son of Late Nandan Ray

7. Samarjeet Ray @ Amarjeet Ray Son of Bindeshwari Ray

8. Mukesh Ray, Son of Hareshwar Ray

9. Rakesh Ray Son of Hareshwar Ray null

10. Hareshwar Ray Son of Late Nandan Ray

11. Ranjan Ray @ Rajan Ray Son of Baleshwar Ray

12. Golu Thakur, Son of Ajeet Thakur

13. Ashok Ray, Son of Baleshwar Ray null

14. Baleshwar Ray @ Baleshwar Ray Son of Late Nandan Ray All are Resident of Village- Karnpura, P.S.- Ganga Bridge, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Sudha Devi Son of Sukrit Ray, R/o Karanpura, P.S.- Ganga Bridge, DistVaishali at Hajipur. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. M.K. Gautam (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-07-2016 Today a counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of Opposite party No.2, stating therein that the petitioners are involved in more criminal cases than what has been disclosed in paragraph 3 of the application seeking anticipatory bail. Let the same be kept on record.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This application for anticipatory bail arises out of Vaishali at Hajipur Complaint Case No. 3557 of 2015, disclosing offences under Sections 302, 364,201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

This application is rejected.

The petitioners are directed to surrender before the court below within four weeks from today and seek regular bail, if so advised. If they do so, their application for regular bail shall be considered on its own merit, without being prejudiced by rejection of present application for grant of anticipatory bail. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ArunKumar/- U