Pravin Rajak @ Praveen Rajak v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15054 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-275 Year-2022 Thana- ROSERA District- Samastipur ====================================================== PRAVIN RAJAK @ PRAVEEN RAJAK S/O DEVOO RAJAK Resident of Village- Hirimiya, P.S.- 04, P.S.- Rosera, District- Samasiipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar Sinha, Adv. With Mr.Shishir Kumar Shishir, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 28-04-2023 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in para-6 of this petition in course of the day.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of killing the daughter of the informant and disappeared her dead body. It is further alleged that the accused persons were engaged in the profession of preparing Mahua wine and selling it.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15054 of 2023(2) dt.28-04-2023 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is the Bhaisur of the deceased. He submitted that the petitioner has no concern with mess and business of the deceased as well as her husband and the petitioner lives separately from them. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 06.11.2022. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M., Rosera, Samastipur in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 275 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T