Ranjeet Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7634 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -92 Year- 2014 Thana -PURAINI District- MADHEPURA ======================================================

1. Ranjeet Mandal, son of Sri Basdev Mandal @ Basudeo Mandal, resident of Village- Badiya Tola, P.S.- Raghubansh Nagar, District- Purnea. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amit Kumar Anand For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Akhileshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 27-02-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody since 27.09.2014 in connection with Puraini P.S. Case No. 92/2014 for the offences registered under Sections 399, 402 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the ground that the petitioner bears criminal antecedents and in view of wrong statement made in the Court regarding non-filing of anticipatory bail, the Court hearing his bail application was constrained to reject the bail petition of the petitioner. The allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of illegal arms. Having considered the aforesaid facts and the period of custody already undergone by the petitioner in connection with present case in which trial is already in progress, but not a single

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7634 of 2018 (4) dt.27-02-2018 2/2 witness has been examined uptill now, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Madhepura in connection with Puraini P.S. Case No. 92/2014, corresponding to S.Tr. No. 56/2015, subject to the following conditions:-

(1) One of the bailors will be his father.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Anjana Mishra, J.) Rakhi U T