Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45315/2017bail granted

Dharmendar @ Pamri v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-15Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45315 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45315 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -204 Year- 2016 Thana -FATEHPUR District- GAYA ====================================================== Dharmendar @ Pamri, Son of Shree Chand Yadav, R/o Village - Dumarichatti, P.S. Fatehpur, Dist. Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sumeet Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Parmeshwar Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-09-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 204 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 272, 273/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(a)(g) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of about 34 litres of country made liquory from the petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 25.06.2017 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, quantity of recovery and period of custody and also that petitioner has no

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45315 of 2017 (2) dt.15-09-2017 criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Excise Judge, Gaya, in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 204 of 2016.

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T