Bire Lal Soren And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34967 of 2017 (2) dt.03-08-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.34967 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2017 Thana -CHAKAI District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Bire Lal Soren, Son of Late Janaki Soren,

2. Babu Lal Soren S/o Sita Ram Soren, Both R/o Village- Binjha, P.S.- Chakai, Dist.- Jamui.

.... .... Petitioners/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners/s : Mr. Prabhat Ranjan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Priya Saran Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-08-2017 The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Chakai P.S. Case No. 22 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of (Prevention of Witch Practice) Act. Allegation against the petitioners that they killed the father and mother of the informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners save and except suspicion as the petitioners had earlier called the mother of the informant daain and threatened her for dire consequences, there is nothing against the petitioners so as to show their involvement in the present case. Further they have no criminal antecedents and have been in judicial custody since 17.03.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34967 of 2017 (2) dt.03-08-2017 bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-II, Jamui, in connection with Chakai P.S. Case No. 22 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T