Satya Narayan Roy v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.33209 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -16 Year- 2015 Thana -KHAZANIHAT District- PURNIA ======================================================

1. Satya Narayan Roy S/o Late Banaras Roy, Resident of Debdhukohar, P.S.-Gopalpur, District-Siwan.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumari Ritambhara, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Priya Saran Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406/419/420/467/468/471/120B of the Indian Penal Code. The complainant had entered into an agreement to sell with co-accused Kanchan Rai, the father-in-law of the petitioner, and the consideration money was transferred to the bank account of the petitioner. Hence, on failure to perform the contract by Kanchan Rai, the present F.I.R. has been lodged. Submission of the petitioner is that at the instance of father-in-law money was transferred to the account of this petitioner, which was returned back to the account of father-in-law

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33209 of 2017 (2) dt.24-07-2017 2/2 and there is no allegation of otherwise direct involvement against the petitioner with the complainant.

Considering the facts aforesaid, Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea/Successor Court in connection with K. Hat Police Station Case No.16 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. With further condition that petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation and trial of the case, failing which the Court-below shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail-bonds of the petitioner in this case. (Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T