Ajay Ram v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.25088 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1938 Year- 2012 Thana -BHOJPUR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictBHOJPUR ====================================================== Ajay Ram S/o Ramchandra Ram Resident of Village Near Alu Godown Khagaul, P.S. Khagaul (Danapur), District Patna. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Sima Devi W/o Ajay Ram Resident of Near Alu Godown Khagaul, P.S. Khagaul (Danapur), District Patna.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajani Ranjan Pd. Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Parties : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 21-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act registered in connection with Complaint Case No. 1938 of 2012, Tr. No. 3786 of 2012.

3. Pursuant to the directions of this Court, the parties are personally present in Court and have expressed their readiness to leave the Court premises in order to resume a harmonious matrimonial life together. However, the OP No. 2 expresses apprehension of ill-treatment at the hands of her inlaws in future.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, the provisional anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner by order dated 20.10.2014 by this Court in connection with Complaint Case No. 1938 of 2012, Tr. No. 3786

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25088 of 2014 (10) dt.21-09-2016 of 2012 pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Bhojpur at Ara is hereby confirmed, subject to the following conditions- (i) That the petitioner shall keep the opposite party no. 2 with due dignity and honour and in case any similar complaint is filed by the opposite party no. 2 in future, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(ii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T