← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14852/2025bail granted

Ramdayal Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-07Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14852 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-87 Year-2021 Thana- PIPRAHI District- Sheohar ====================================================== 1.

Ramdayal Paswan Son of Late Doman Paswan Resident of Village- Amba Ojha Tola, P.S.- Piprahi and Distt.- Sheohar 2.

Chulahi Paswan @ Chulhai Paswan Son of Ramdayal Paswan Resident of Village- Amba Ojha Tola, P.S.- Piprahi and Distt.- Sheohar 3.

Indu Devi @ Bindu Devi Wife of Chulahi Paswan @ Chulhai Paswan Resident of Village- Amba Ojha Tola, P.S.- Piprahi and Distt.- Sheohar 4.

Fula Devi Wife of Mahendra Paswan Resident of Village- Kamrauli, P.S.- Piprahi and Distt.- Sheohar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

NEHA KUMARI JITU PASWAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-AMBA OJHA TOLA, P. S.-PIPRAHI, DISTRICT-SHEOHAR.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Deepak Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 07-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Piprahi P.S. case No.87 of 2021, registered under Sections 493, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that the co-accused Dilip Paswan established physical relation with the victim for last three years after alluring her to perform marriage. The allegation against the petitioners is of abusing the informant in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14852 of 2025(4) dt.07-11-2025 2/3 filthy language.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are grandfather, maternal uncle, maternal aunt and mother of the main accused Dilip Paswan against whom there is allegation of continuing sexual relation with the informant at the pretext of marriage. The petitioners are the persons of clean antecedent. They have falsely been implicated merely because they are close relatives of the main accused Dilip Paswan. He has also submitted that co-accused Dilip Paswan has been granted anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 20.05.2022 in Cr. Misc. No. 5236 of 2022.

5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State and the learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the petitioners also abused the informant when she went to complain to their house.

6. The petitioners are close relatives of the main accused Dilip Paswan. Moreover, Dilip Paswan has been granted anticipatory bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court.

7. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14852 of 2025(4) dt.07-11-2025 3/3 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge POCSO, Sheohar in connection with Piprahi P.S. case No.87 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) kundan/- U T