Ramaugrah Sah v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6334 of 2016 ====================================================== Ramaugrah Sah Son of late Dwarika Sah Resident of Lalparsa, PS. Sikta District West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through Secretary Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Land Reform Deputy Collector, Narkatiyaganj, District West Champaran.

3.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Narkatiyaganj District West Champaran. 4.

The Circle Officer, Sikta, District West Champaran. 5.

Suresh Sah Son of late Dwarika Sah Resident of Lalparsa, PS. Sikta District West Champaran.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bhagya Narayan Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sc29-R.R.K.Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. This writ application has been filed for issuance of direction to the respondent authorities to create Jamabandi in the name of the petitioner and to cancel the Jamabandi which has been created in favour of respondent No. 5 instead of the petitioner in Mutation Case No. 01/2010-15.

3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner requests for disposal of the writ application granting liberty to the petitioner to move before the competent authority in accordance with law for redressal of his grievance.

4. In view of the limited prayer made on behalf of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.6334 of 2016(3) dt.15-01-2024 2/2 petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move before the competent authority in accordance with law

5. It goes without saying that if any question of limitation arises before the competent authority, the same shall be considered taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner was pursuing the issue before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

6. With the above observation, the writ application stands disposed of.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U