← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3535/2023disposed

Raj Ranjan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-07-25Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3535 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.

Raj Ranjan Singh (Male), Aged about 69 years, S/o Sri Nageshwar Prasad Singh, Resident of H.No.12, Radha Rani Sinha Road, Infront of Akashwani, Adampur, Jagdishpur, Police Station- Adampur, District- Bhagalpur. 2.

Eqbal Hasan Azad (Male) aged about 68 years, Son of Late Syed Mohammad Saleh, Resident of Shah Zubair Road, Shah Colony, P.S.- Purabsarai, District- Munger 3.

Abdur Rahman, (Male) aged about 68 years, Son of Abdul Mannan, Resident of Mohammadpur Koiri Tola, Mahendru, P.S.- Mahendru, DistrictPatna. 4.

Umesh Prasad Singh, (Male) aged about 69 years, Son of Ran Vijay Singh Resident of Upar Jamtikari Road, Sahebganj, Mohanpur, Nath Nagar, P.S.- Nath Nagar, District- Bhagalpur.

5.

Sunil Kumar Singh, (Male) aged about 70 years, Son of Sri Mahendra Narayan Singh, Resident of 132 E, West of Techno Point, Lal Bagh, Tilkamanjhi, Jagdishpur, P.S.- Tilkamanjhi District- Bhagalpur. 6.

Abha Rani Nigam (female), aged about 67 years, D/o Achal Bhari Nigm, Resident of Niti Bagh, Raysar, Badudeopur, Police Station- Kotwali, District- Munger. 7.

Kumari Manju (Female), aged about 69 years, Wife of Biny Kumar Mishra, Resident of opposite Konark Cinema, Puraniganj, P.S.-Karim Bazar, District-Munger. 8.

Vinod Kumar Singh (Male), aged about 69 years, Son of Sri Gunjeshari Prasad Singh, Resident of Mangal Baaar, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Munger. 9.

Prashant Kumar Sinha (Male), aged about 69 years, Son of Srichand Mishra, Resident of Road No. 10, Rajendra Nagar, P.S.- Kadamkuan, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary Education Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, Higher Education Department of Education Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Vice-Chancellor, Tilka Manjhi University, Bhagalpur. 4.

The Registrar, Tilka Manjhi University, Bhagalpur. 5.

The Finance Officer, Tilka Manjhi University, Bhagalpur. 6.

The Vice Chancellor, Munger University, Munger. 7.

The Registrar, Munger University, Munger.

8.

The Finance Officer, Munger University, Munger. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

Patna High Court CWJC No.3535 of 2023(2) dt.25-07-2023 2/3 For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjiv Sharan, Advocate For the Munger University:

Mr. Rashid Izhar, Advocate For the TMBU :

Mr. Ashhar Mustafa, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Shankar Kumar Thakur, AC to GP-27 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-07-2023 Heard Mr. Sanjiv Sharan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners; Mr. Rashid Izhar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Munger University, Mr. Ashhar Mustafa, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Tilka Manjhi University Bhagalpur and Mr. Shankar Kumar Thakur, AC to learned GP-27 for the State.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks to file a detailed representation before the Registrar of the Munger University, Munger, which has come into existence after reconstitution of the said university and considering that the college concerned was initially constituent unit of Tilka Manjhi University, Bhagalpur, the Registrar of the Tilka Manjhi University, Bhagalpur, must ensure to send the entire records relating to the petitioner to the Registrar of the Munger University, Munger, without waiting for any representation to be filed on behalf of the petitioners.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file a detailed representation before the Registrar of the Munger University,

Patna High Court CWJC No.3535 of 2023(2) dt.25-07-2023 3/3 Munger, who shall ensure to make payment of the entire amount as claimed by the petitioners in their representation within a period of six weeks in accordance with law.

4. The petitioners must ensure to file their individual representation giving details relating to their grievance.

5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U