Md. Rizwan @ Bablu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15551 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-215 Year-2010 Thana- SAKRA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

Md. Rizwan @ Bablu S/O Md. Salim R/O Village - Boariya, P.S- Sakra, Distt.- Muzaffarpur.

2.

Md. Imteyaz S/O Md. Salim R/O Village - Boariya, P.S- Sakra, Distt.- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pradeep Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nityanand, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 02-04-2025 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioners and Learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in connection with Sakra (Muzaffarpur) P.S. Case No. 215 of 2010 lodged on 29.04.2010, for the offence punishable under Sections 304(B) & 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against six named accused persons including the present petitioners against whom there is allegation that they have killed the informant's sister due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Counsel also submits that petitioners are devars of the victim (deceased) and they used to live with their family separately. In this regard, he has provided a certificate from mukhiya of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15551 of 2025(2) dt.02-04-2025 2/2 locality. Counsel submits that petitioners were unnecessarily been made accused in this case. Counsel further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Counsel submits that petitioners had been living with their family separately after the marriage of their brother i.e. husband of the victim (deceased) and working there as a labour.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

6. As such, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class (East), Court no.10, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Sakra (Muzaffarpur) P.S. Case No. 215 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Divyansh/- U T