Govind Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14548 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-804 Year-2025 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
Govind Kumar S/o- Hari Ray Vill- Narayanpur PS-Garkha District- Saran 2.
Anil Ray S/o- Brijnanda Ray Vill- Narayanpur PS-Garkha District- Saran 3.
Arvind Ray @ Arvind Kumar S/o- Hari Ray Vill- Narayanpur PS-Garkha District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Danish Raja, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Narsingh Tanti, APP For the Informant Mr. Rananjay Kumar, Advocate Mr. Sharfraz Ahmad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State .
2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) & (3) and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14548 of 2026(3) dt.12-05-2026 2/3 3 . As per F.I.R. informant alleged that on 25.10.2025, petitioner No. 3 assaulted informant by means of sword, as a result of which informant sustained injury in his right hand. Petitioner No. 1 assaulted informant on the head of informant by means of farsa and petitioner No. 2 assaulted informant by means of iron rod.
4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that both the parties are co-villagers and due to long-standing land dispute, they have been made accused in this case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus against these petitioners. Injury caused by petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 is simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.
5 . Learned counsel for the State opposed the bail petition and submitted that injury caused by petitioner No. 3, namely, Arvind Ray @ Arvind Kumar is grievous in nature.
6. Considering the fact that injury caused by petitioner No. 3 is grievous in nature, his prayer for pre - arrest bail is rejected.
7. Considering the nature of injury, clean antecedent of petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 and other circumstances of the case , in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioner Nos. 1 and 2, as named above, be
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14548 of 2026(3) dt.12-05-2026 3/3 enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court of Magistrate 1st Class, saran at Chapra in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 804 of 2025 , subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 ( 2 ) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS) , 2023 . (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T