Dinesh Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6816 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Dinesh Prasad, Son of Late Jugeshwar Prasad resident of village Mai, P.O. Chiraily, P.S. Khizersarai, District - Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna

4. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Gaya Region, Gaya

5. The District Magistrate, Gaya

6. The District Superintendent of Education, Gaya

7. The District Programme officer ( Establishment ), Gaya

8. The District Education officer, Gaya

9. The Sub Divisional officer, Nimchak, Bathani, Gaya

10. The Block Education officer, Khizersarai, Gaya

11. Smt. Punam Kumari, In Charge Principal +2, Ram Peyari High School School, Chiraily, Khizersaria, Gaya

12. Mohd. Alam, Assistant Teacher +2, Ram Peyari High School School, Chiraily, Khizersaria, Gaya .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Suryadeo Yadav, AAG-IX. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 20-09-2016 Heard Mr. Sudhir Kumar, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. Suryadeo Yadav, learned Additional Advocate General No.IX, appearing on behalf of the State-respondents.

Having regard to the fact that though the petitioner has made allegations of defalcation/misappropriation of public

Patna High Court CWJC No.6816 of 2016 (2) dt.20-09-2016 2/2 fund, the petition is completely vague and does not, therefore, warrant invocation of extraordinary jurisdiction of the High Court, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. While, accordingly, closing the writ petition, we give the petitioner liberty to lodge, if so advised, a First Information Report with jurisdictional police station or file a complaint in the criminal court of competent jurisdiction. If a First Information Report is lodged or the complaint is filed, the same shall be dealt with expeditiously and in accordance with law.

With the above observation, this writ petition stands disposed of.

(I.A. Ansari,CJ) (Anjana Mishra, J) K.C.jha/- U