Salendra Singh @ Satyender Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24445 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2019 Thana- BAUSI District- Araria ====================================================== 1.

SALENDRA SINGH @ SATYENDER SINGH Son of Uttam Lal Singh Resident of Village- Basaithi, P.S.- Bounsi, District- Araria. 2.

Batiya Devi Wife of Salendra Singh @ Satyender Singh Resident of VillageBasaithi, P.S.- Bounsi, District- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 19-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is expected to honour his undertaking given in the instant case for depositing the requisite court fee and to remove the defect(s) as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is a case of dowry death due to non-fulfilment of dowry demand.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that after investigation, the police filed form

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24445 of 2021(2) dt.19-01-2022 2/2 against the petitioners and they have not been sent up for trial but the concerned Court, took cognizance against all the FIR named accused persons. It is also submitted that the husband of the deceased was in custody and the chargesheet has also been submitted against him. He further submits that petitioners are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased and they have no concern with the mess and business of the deceased and her husband.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- Ist, Araria in connection with Bausi P.S. Case No. 12 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

brajesh kumar/- (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) U