Binod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16073 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-286 Year-2019 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== BINOD KUMAR Son of Surendra Mahto Resident of Sector- 4E, Block-9, Jhopri, P.S. Sector 4, District Bokaro (Jharkhand). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Naresh Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shaheen Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 12-06-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Excise Case No. 286 of 2019 for the offence registered under Section 30 (a) of the Bihar prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submits that on perusal of the seizure list, it appears that the alleged recovery has been made from the vehicle of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16073 of 2020(2) dt.12-06-2020 2/2 petitioner. Hence, he is not entitled to grant anticipatory bail. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined the grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. It is, accordingly rejected.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) Jagdish/- U T