Md. Jakir v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25217 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-510 Year-2019 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.

MD. JAKIR SON OF MD. RAHIMUDDIN Resident of Village - Tillitola, Amauna, P.S.- Jogbanni, Distt.- Araria, State - Bihar. 2.

MOBINA KHATUN W/O MD. JAKIR Resident of Village - Tillitola, Amauna, P.S.- Jogbanni, Distt.- Araria, State - Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Sanjida Khatoon W/o Rizwan, D/o Md. Jasim Resident of Village - Mohanpur, Katahara, P.S.- Chhatapur, Distt.- Supaul, State Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kuldeep Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 21-01-2022 This matter has been taken up for hearing online because of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is expected to honour his undertaking to remove the defects as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 510C of 2019 instituted for the offence under Sections 498A, 323, 504 of the Indian Penal

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25217 of 2021(2) dt.21-01-2022 2/3 Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, petitioners are parentsin-law of the complainant. Petitioners along with family members have tortured in various ways due to non-fulfillment dowry demand and finally they ousted her after snatching her belongings.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. They have never demanded any thing from the informant. They have no concern with the daily activity of the complainant and her husband and are living separately. The sole responsibility to take care of wife is upon husband of the complainant and not against the petitioners.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Complaint Case No. 510C/2019, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25217 of 2021(2) dt.21-01-2022 3/3 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate1stClass, Supaul subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U