The State Of Bihar And ORS v. Tawindarjit Mining And Construction
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.1075 of 2014 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 13479 of 2013 ===========================================================
1. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary of Mines and Geology, Government of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, Bihar.
2. The Principal Secretary cum Commissioner, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road,Patna, Bihar.
3. The Director, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna, Bihar.
4. The Joint Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road,Patna, Bihar.
5. The Collector, District- Nawadah.
6. The Assistant Director, Mines, Nawadah.
.... .... Appellants
Versus
Tawindarjit Mining & Construction Ltd., having its Registred office At 18, Madan Mohan Tala Street Kolkata 700005, and havint its Branch office ate Village and Post Oraina, P.S. Muffasil, District- Nawada represented through its Managing Director, Kunal Deep Singh Gujral residing at 133, Narang Colony, A Block Janak Puri, New Delhi- 110058 .... .... Respondent =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellants : Mr. D.K.Sinha, Senior Advocate Mr. Rajendra Prasad, Spl. P.P. Mines For the Respondent : Mr. Anil Singh, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 08-04-2017 The Court is not willing to waste valuable judicial time on academic adjudication since in terms of the decision of the learned single Judge, the date of the lease begins from 30th November, 2010 and since it was for a period of five years, it has come to an end on 29th November, 2015.
The submission of learned Senior Counsel for the
Patna High Court LPA No.1075 of 2014 dt.08-04-2017 2/2 appellants that the question of law subsists, can be considered in an appropriate case where the lis still subsists. Appeal is dismissed.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) Pawan/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 10.04.2017 Transmission Date N/A