← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17886/2023allowed

Pintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-05-12Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17886 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-523 Year-2022 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

Pintu Kumar Son Of Suresh Chauhan Resident Of Village - Silauta, Ward No.- 15, Bikramganj, P.S.- Bikramganj, District - Rohtas. 2.

Sudhanshu Singh Son Of Dudheshwar Singh Resident Of Village - Wazirganj, Ward No.- 1, Sasaram, P.S.- Sasaram Town, District - Rohtas. 3.

Sadanand Shahi @ Sujit @ Sadanand Sah Son Of Dayanand Sah Resident Of Village - Narayanpur, P.S.- Suryapura, District - Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajani Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bishweshwar Ram ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 12-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per prosecution case, it is alleged that some miscreants committed loot on pistol point and snatched cash of Rs. 6000/- and they also assaulted the informant. It is further alleged that co-accused was apprehended by the police.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17886 of 2023(2) dt.12-05-2023 2/2 petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in this case. Neither the petitioners are named in the FIR, nor they have been put on TIP. The petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that nothing looted article has been recovered from their conscious possession. The petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since 08.12.2022. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioners, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 523 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Manish/- U T