← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15833/2025bail granted

Shashikant Mishra @ Shashi Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-19Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15833 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2165 Year-2023 Thana- WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Shashikant Mishra @ Shashi Ranjan Kumar S/o Late Mahendra Mishra Resident of Vill- Krishna Nagar Sant Kabir Road, Banuchhapar, P.S.- Banuchhapar, Dist- West Champaran 2.

Akhilesh Kumar Mishra @ Akhilesh Kumar S/o Late Mahendra Mishra Resident of Vill- Krishna Nagar Sant Kabir Road, Banuchhapar, P.S.- Banuchhapar, Dist- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Sunil Kumar Tiwari S/o Late Ramakant Tiwari R/o vill - Banuchhapar, Gayatri Colony, P.S.- Banuchhapar, Distt.- West Champaran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Rita Verma Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay.

For the O.P. No. 2 :

Mr. Ajeet Kumar Bhardwaj ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-02-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 2165C of 2023 for offences under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is accused of cheating the complainant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are quite innocent and have not committed any

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15833 of 2025(5) dt.19-02-2026 2/3 offence. He further submits that this is a case of a civil dispute. He also submits that the petitioner, without admitting his guilt and without prejudice, is ready to return Rs. 60,000/- to the complainant.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Murarli Lal Gupta Vs Gopi Singh, (2005) 13 SCC 699, this application for anticipatory bail stands allowed.

7. Accordingly, let the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today in the Court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, West Champaran, Bettiah/concerned court below in connection with Complaint Case No. 2165C of 2023 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS and with further condition that:- At the time of furnishing bail bonds, the petitioner shall produce a demand draft of Rs. 60,000/- in the name of the complainant before the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15833 of 2025(5) dt.19-02-2026 3/3 Court below, and thereafter, the bail bonds of the petitioner shall be accepted. The Court shall release the demand draft in favor of the complainant after the acceptance of the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T