Noushad Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19788 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-313 Year-2024 Thana- GUTHANI District- Siwan ====================================================== Noushad Ansari S/o Julfakar Miya Resident of Village- Netwar, PS- Darauli, District- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Nawnit Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and perused the case diary.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Guthani P.S. Case No. 313 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 331(4), 305 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, some unknown miscreants have committed theft in the house of the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19788 of 2025(3) dt.08-07-2025 2/3 incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. Name of the petitioner has transpired in this case in course of investigation. It is further submitted that the police has recovered one motorcycle and the petitioner has got no concern with the alleged motorcycle. No any looted article has been recovered either from the possession or from the house of the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 05.12.2024 and has got four criminal antecedents.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail after framing of charge, if not already framed on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Guthani P.S. Case No. 313 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19788 of 2025(3) dt.08-07-2025 3/3 (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.
(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T