Patna High CourtCWJC/6347/2016disposed

Anurag Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-12-20Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6347 of 2016 ====================================================== Anurag Kumar, Son of Late Brij Bihari Singh, Resident of Village- Saidpur, Post Office and Police Station- Khagaul, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. District Magistrate, Patna, District- Patna.

4. District Education Officer, Patna, District- Patna.

5. District Programme Officer (Estt.), Patna, District- Patna.

6. Drawing and Disbursing Officer, Middle School, LalKothi, Danapur, District- Patna.

7. Accountant General, (A&E), Bihar, Patna.

8. Treasury Officer, Patna Treasury, District- Patna.

9. Treasury Officer, Sub-Treasury, Danapur, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the State :

Mr. Anil Kumar Verma, A.C. to A.A.G. 9 For the Accountant General :

Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 20-12-2017 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State and Accountant General are present and have assisted the Court.

2. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no. 9, indicating that all admitted retiral dues have been paid to the petitioner.

3. Initially, after having recorded the fact that learned counsel on record for the petitioner had passed away,

Patna High Court CWJC No.6347 of 2016 (8) dt.20-12-2017 2/2 notice was issued to the petitioner which has also been validly served. However, today also nobody appeared on his behalf.

4. In view of the position emerging, the Court can only presume that all admitted dues of the petitioner stand paid and, thus, he has lost interest to pursue the matter.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off.

6. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file a detailed representation before the competent authority, if anything further according to him remains unpaid, which shall be considered expeditiously in accordance with law. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U