Pavan Kumar @ Pawan Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.35241 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-82 Year-2017 Thana- UJIYARPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Pavan Kumar @ Pawan Kumar Mahto Son of Prem Lal Mahto, R/o VillageMannipur, P.S.- Waris Nagar,( Mathurapur O.P. ), District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rana Sanjay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. RAM ANURAG SINGH ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 10-08-2017 I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30 (a) and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

It is contended that, as per allegation, 252 bottles of foreign liquor each containing of 750 Ml. were recovered from the Magic vehicle. Petitioner is said to be engaged in unloading the liquor. It is further stated that co-accused Sanjeev Kumar Sanjeev Kumar Sah has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 20.7.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 33188/2017. Petitioner claims that he is in custody since 18.5.2017. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35241 of 2017(2) dt.10-08-2017 2/2 Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 6th Addl. Sessions Judge, Samastipur in connection with Ujiyarpur P.S. Case No. 82 of 2017. If the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found involved in similar nature of cases then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds. .

That apart, in view of the antecedent of the petitioner, he would be required to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Samastipur within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and every month thereafter for the next six months. The conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in the aforesaid period by the Superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the petitioner before the court concerned which should be granted by the Superintendent of Police concerned upon his appearance. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Spd/- U T